To Nella Larson: the concept of black sexuality discussed in your novel is truly intriguing. The concept tend to be viewed in two parts: male sexuality and female sexuality. To some extent, this view also reflect the issue of race as a social construct: the whites don't view the blacks as true human beings, but actually creatures. The whites consider black females as "exotic images for sexual symbols", and for the black males, they are characterized as "savages" and "barbarians" to justufy lynching, segregation, and racial discrimination. However, here is a quite critical question: is it true that these stereotypcial view of the whites are indestructable? Is it real that for African-Americans, the environment itself is just like a pile of quicksand that swallows you in when you struggle harder"? This question have been asked for generations.
How do get "the right to difference"?
The following is a letter written to Willow S. Lung-Aman, author of “Trespassers? Asian Americans and the Battle for Suburbia.” Dear Ms. Lung-Aman, After reading your book “Trespassers? Asian Americans and the Battle for Suburbia,” I was intrigued by your call for respecting “a right to difference.” You suggest that people of different identities should have to right to express one’s difference without exclusion or discrimination. In principle, I do not dispute that one should have genuine freedom of expression, but I am concerned how this can be realized. The first problem relates to the difficulty in convincing privileged communities to let go of their vested interests, which has existed since the beginning of human history, so I’ll move away from that. The second problem, related to the first to some extent, is how can we ensure that institutions can remain dynamic enough to allow for change. Just a few thoughts. Sincerely, Kare...
Comments
Post a Comment