To the director of the movie Gentlemen's Agreement: In my personal opinion, your way of expressing the issues of anti-semitism using the theme of "passing" is really creative. The inherent sueriority of the method of passing used as a way for investigation is that it put people into a realistic context to experience all kinds of struggles and dilemmas a minority may fae under various circumstances.   However, in my personal point of view, rather than using an actual "bystander" in the anti-semitism issue instead of an aJew makes the information conveyed in the movie seem to be like a "second hand source"--any creator of novels or films cannot discern the true feelings of a certain character without actually describing his or her feelings from his or her point of view. On the other hand, the way of expressing themes in the movie seem to be like a disorderly hodgepodge: emotions between family, love affaires, social issues... If a piece of film is piled up with more than two themes, it's inevitably going to be confusing. Last but not the least, the way the main theme of passing for investigation on anti-semitism came up too suddenly for the audiences to acutally perceive it in a proper way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Discern a Race Issue?