Reconsidering Roles
Dear Gregory Peck,
In your 1947 movie Gentleman’s Agreement you play a journalist (Phillip Green) who
pretends to be Jewish in order to better understand anti-Semitism. Before
taking the role, did you consider the character that you would be embodying? Did
you think about the merit of his actions? About whether or not they aligned
with your conscious and morals? If not, I urge you to do so now.
You don’t really
know someone until you walk a mile in their shoes—or so the saying goes. Of course,
leaving the figurative realm and actually adopting an identity that is not your
own is a completely different matter. Phillip Green’s decision to pose as a
Jewish man in Gentleman’s Agreement
is problematic for several reasons. Although he comes from a place of good intentions,
Green completely bypasses empathy and denies the experience of actual Jewish
people. Real, true empathy is about feeling for something or someone that is independent
of oneself—in this case, the Jewish community. Imagining oneself in that community
or taking it one step further and actually inserting oneself into it is the
easy way out. Making it personal reveals that Green is incapable of true
empathy—in essence, he doesn’t really care about anti-Semitism until it’s
happening to him and his family.
Furthermore, Green’s
performance invalidates the experiences of actual Jewish people. Prior to
pretending to be Jewish, Green lamented that there was nothing to the story of
anti-Semitism but statistics. Why did Green not talk to Jewish community members?
Why did he not observe the anti-Semitism that was going on all around him in
New York City? By instead pretending to be Jewish and writing about his
experiences, Green implies that anti-Semitism is not noteworthy or concerning
until it happens to a gentile.
Finally, Green’s
performance makes the assumption that living as Jewish for a few weeks is
equivalent to a lifetime of anti-Semitism. Green was, clearly, not raised
Jewish—he wasn’t bullied in school, wasn’t rejected from countless schools and
jobs, wasn’t called anti-Semitic slurs on his way home, etc. Yes, he
experiences anti-Semitism during the few weeks that he “is” Jewish; but to
equate that to year after year of oppression and exclusion is an insult to
those who live that way. For many people, Judaism isn’t something that they can
put on and take off as they please. It’s a part of their identity. It’s who
they are.
I hope that I’ve given
you a few things to think about. In the future, perhaps you’ll think more
carefully before accepting such a role.
Sincerely,
Annabel Chosy
Comments
Post a Comment