American Authenticity

Dear Philip J. Deloria,

In your book Playing Indian you make the argument that "whenever white Americans have confronted crises of identity, some of them have inevitably turned to Indians," linking "Indianness" with "authenticity." Throughout the book, you discuss that what Americans mean when they use the terms "Indian" or "Native American" often does not refer to the realities of the people themselves, but rather a sort of misunderstood and romanticized notion of The Indian: someone who simultaneously bears strong roots to the environment of North America (and evidenced by his diet) and yet whose wild nature can also be used as 1) a costume, allowing colonists to engage in usually inappropriate practices like rioting under the guise of a savage who embodies freedom to do as one pleases; and 2) a scapegoat, whose savageness can be used to blame anything that happens. These two phenomenons are clearly seen not only in the Boston Tea Party case but in the Mast Tree riot as well. I wonder if donning an Indian costume helped those participants feel more strongly connected to their cause, and thus more "authentic," in the face of a lack of true American identity.

Sincerely,
Dana

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Discern a Race Issue?